| Boy Killed in Church Tower | Inquest from 21st December 1861 Huddersfield Weekly Examiner |
| Atkinson Mill Fire Colne Bridge 1818 | Leeds Mercury 21st February 1818 |
| Colne Bridge Forge | Huddersfield Examiner 1933 |
| Highway Robberies | From Jeff Stafford |
| Manslaughter at Dalton | Huddersfield Weekly Examiner |
Fatal Accident at Kirkheaton Church:
Yesterday afternoon an inquest was held at the Beaumont
Arms, Kirkheaton, before J.R. Ingham, Esq. Deputy coroner touching the death of
Albert Rhodes, a boy ten and half years old, son of the late John Rhodes of
Lepton. The deceased met with his death in the belfry of Kirkheaton Church. Joe
Brook, the first witness said: I am a Scholar at the same school as the deceased
attended. On Wednesday last, at about one o’clock, the deceased, I and three
other boys, went up into the ringers’ room at Kirkheaton Church.
The ringers were not ringing, in about ten minutes we all came down again with
exception of the deceased. As I was coming down I shouted out “Albert, come on,”
but I received no answer. I never saw him alive again. James Broadbent, weaver,
of Kirkheaton, said: On Wednesday I was ringing at Kirkheaton Church, on the
occasion of a marriage. I remember several boys coming up into the ringing room
about one o’clock. I did not notice the deceased.
They soon afterwards left and shut the door; there are steps just outside the
ringers’ room, leading up into the belfry. We had left the bells with the mouths
up or set. I had just seized hold of my rope to commence ringing when if
suddenly came down upon my head, I said there is something wrong.
Rufus Green, another ringer then went up to the top of the ladder leading to the
belfry, but came quickly down again and said I’ll not go up yonder by myself,
there’s blood running down the wall. Joseph Jenkinson ringer then went up with
him. I saw no more.
There is a ladder leading into the belfry, and there is also a trap door, which
I do not think the deceased could lift, I do not know any others.
P.C 139 said there was a hole at the top of the ladder leading under the bells,
through which a man might get if the bells were set.
Joseph Jenkinson was next could: He corroborated the previous witness’s
statement, and added that he found the deceased under the bells, with a
frightful cut on the head. He thought the deceased must have had hold of the
“stay” (a piece of wood against which the bell rests), and at the moment the
last witness seized the rope the bell most have overbalanced, and hitting his
head knocked him against the wall.
He said the back of the door leading to the belfry wanted repairing in
consequence of that the deceased might have got through.
After hearing these statements, the jury returned a verdict that “ deceased died
from injuries caused by being accidentally struck by a bell in Kirkheaton
Church.”
It appears that the family to which the deceased belonged has been very
unfortunate having four of its members killed within the last twenty years. The
father was killed three year ago by an explosion of firedamp, in a pit, he was a
steward, and his Grandfather was run over by a cart.
Colne
Bridge Cotton Mill Fire
Thomas Atkinson the third son of Joseph Atkinson was the proprietor of an
extensive Woollen manufacturing concern at Bradley Mills. He also owned a cotton
mill at Colne Bridge. Eighty persons employed at the mill, and it was the
practise to work machinery in the night and during the day.
On the night of Friday, February 14th 1818, a most destructive fire broke out in
the cotton factory of Mr Atkinson situated at Colne Bridge, about three miles
from Huddersfield. It appears that the machinery in part of the building in part
of the building worked by Day and Night.
At 5am, a boy of the name of James Thornton had been sent down for Rovings from
the card room with a naked candle, instead of the glass lamp provided expressly
for the purpose. One of the overlookers after he was gone, felling sense danger
of such an act of imprudence hastened after the lad, but in vain, for just as he
was entering the lower room, he saw the flames rising from a quantity of cotton
and carded laps, several skips of which were standing under the stairs instantly
in a blaze.
Thornton distressed at the sight of the mischief about which he had
inadvertently committed, ran upstairs to communicate the appalling tidings that
the factory was on fire.
He then hastened back to the top of the stairs and escaped out of the building,
but so rapid was the progress of the flames. That a girl who followed him
dropped through the landing and perished in the flames, all this occurred in the
short space of two minutes and communication by the stairs being now cut off,
the situation of the persons still in the mill became alarming in the extreme.
To add to the horror of the scene, the flames ascended through a tunnel, which
communicated, to the top rooms, were several thousand pounds weight of cotton
lay ready to catch the blaze to spread to the awful conflagration. The card
room, too, were the fire commenced was filled with cotton in different stages of
process and gave to the flames progress.
To attempt to save any part of the property seemed a hopeless effort, and the
attention of the person assembled was wholly directed to rescue of the persons
within, who were all girls from the fate that awaited them. With this view, a
ladder was placed against a small window at the end of the factory, near the
manager’s house, and at the greatest distance from the place were the fire had
first appeared. But every endeavour to induce the children to approach the
ladder was unavailing; on breaking the glass a dense column of smoke which soon
burst into a flame; issued from the opening, and it is possible that before the
humane effort to rescue the children was made the suffocating influence of the
ignited cotton has terminated their suffering.
Renewed efforts
prompted by a glimmering hope, efforts were made to ascertain the place where
the poor children might have fled and to rescue them from the flames but in the
midst of exertions the roof and floors fell in and hope gave place to despair.
In less than half an hour, the entire building, all the machinery, and every
article of the stock were destroyed.
From a combination of unfortunate circumstances, the fire was more like an
explosion or the conflagration of stubble, than the destruction of a substantial
building. Not a vestige of property was saved in the mill but the counting house
and warehouse, being protected by a strong iron wall were preserved.
When everything combustible was consumed, diligent search was made for the
remains of the children, fourteen of them were found in the course of the day;
the others have doubtless been reduced to ashes. At the time of the fire, 26
persons were at work in the mill of whom nine escaped and seventeen perished.
Nine days after the factory holocaust at Colne Bridge, Huddersfield which
shocked the nation, Sir Robert Peel the elder moved the second reading in the
house of commons of his factory Bill declaring “It was his intention if possible
to prevent a recurrence of such a misfortune as that which had lately taken
place. It was his wish to have no night work at all in the factories.
Colne Bridge once the centre of the iron industry
From medieval times until the 19th
century, there have been recorded Iron workings at Colne Bridge. This is
accounted for by the close proximity of the better bed of coal and the black bed
coal plus Ironstone, in monastic times Iron was worked in the neibourhood by the
monks appear to have confined them selves to digging in the better bed.
Indications of this at lambcote, but the main workings were at Bradley wood
there the better bed had under lying Iron Stone nodules below the coal, which
produced the iron.
The chartularies of Fountains Abbey give the first records of iron mining in the
district, Ralph Fitz-Nichols of Cridling gave to the monks in the wood at
Bradley all the wood required for the smelting and for Charcoal and what ever
ironstone they could find.
They might move their forge from place to place with his permission; the site of
these works is near to the river Calder. The first record of a forge at Colne
Bridge is in the Will of 1560 Thomas Beaumont of Lascells Hall which states that
he had been in possession of a Water Mill at a place could Colne-Smithye with
three Cottages, loft, Croft and a parcel of land could Smithie-place.
Later records show the forge to be in the ownership of Thomas Dickins until his
death in 1699. In his Will he states I do give to the poor of Kirkheaton the sum
of six shillings and eight pence, as long as I have the lease of Colne Bridge
forge.
Dickins was the inventor of the early form of rolling mill recorded by Ralph
Thurby in 1715, described as the most remarkable iron forge that might serve
Vulcan himself, and a rolling mill that Mr Dickins has erected for rolling
plates of iron into bars.
There are records that show the family in possession in the year 1701,
Francis Watts succeeded to the forge and ran the business till his death in
1737, he left in his Will £10 to his Clerk John Brook who succeeded him, John
improved the output to reach 150 tons per annum.
In that year, his prosperity is recorded in the diary of John Turner 1756 when
he purchased property in Kirkheaton to the value of £3,000 having an annual
rental of £110.
In 1760 the forge amalgamated with Kirkstall Forge Leeds, John Brook died in
1771 and was succeeded by his nineteen year old son as manager, during this
period Charles Brook started rolling hoops for the first time, and also building
Colne Bridge House.
In 1776, Charles Brook gave up with the forge and took a position of steward to
Sir John Armytage of Kirklees, the fortune of the forge declined.
Highway Robberies
There was a great depression over Yorkshire and the
rest of the country throughout the 1830's. Conditions in the countryside were
very similar to those in the early years of the century. Wages of eight or nine
shillings a week reduced thousands of agricultural workers to starvation
While many poor labourers accepted their fate, some like Joseph Senior turned to
crime to implement their meagre wages. Sometime in early 1830, he formed a close
friendship with William Brummitt, and together they embarked upon a series of
highway robberies. According to his trial records Joseph was the ringleader, he
was twenty-three at the time; Brummitt was 34 years.
On 2 November 1830, they held up Saul Jessop and stole five-pound notes and a
quantity of silver coins when he was returning from Huddersfield market. Their
next victim was Joshua Hirst of Dalton, from whom they stole a number of golden
sovereigns and some silver. Both robberies were carried out on the
Huddersfield/Wakefield Road. Eventually the pair were apprehended and taken
under military escort to York Castle where they were incarcerated pending trial.
On 19 March 1831, the trial of Joseph Senior and William Brummitt took place at
York Assizes. Accounts of the trial appeared in the York Gazette and Leeds
Mercury. After the trial, at which Jessop and Hirst both give evidence, the two
were found guilty and sentenced to death, but this was later commuted to Life
and Transportation.
Joseph spent the next five months in a prison hulk before embarking at
Plymouth on 2 August 1831, with two hundred and twenty male convicts aboard the
Strathfieldsay, which arrived in Van Diemans Land on 15 November 1831. The ships
master was William Harrison, and David Rose the ships surgeon. The physical
description recorded on Joseph's convict papers say he was 24, 5ft and 3 inches
tall, with brown eyes and dark complexion. He was surly and had a mole on his
right breast. It was usual for convicts to be put to work in occupations that
they were familiar with and as Joseph had been a gardener in Lepton, it was
logical that he should carry out similar work in Australia. He was put to work
on the Brickenden Estate near Longford. Brickenden was one of Australia's most
important colonial properties, established by William Archer in 1823.
However, Joseph was a rebel and could not keep out of trouble. On 31 May 1832,
he was charged with being absent without leave from his assigned duties, and was
sentenced to fifty lashes with the cat. This did nothing to stop his rebellious
behaviour. At the beginning of July 1833, he was again charged with being absent
without leave, and given another twenty-five lashes. However, even this did not
curb his rebellious streak. In December 1833, he received anther fifty lashes
for being drunk, using obscene language and having two female convicts in his
hut. This flogging appears to have done the trick for in 1836 he received
permission to marry another convict, Sara Williams. The marriage was solemnized
in the Parch Church of Longford on 9 March 1836.
An inquest was held at the house of Mr John Gummersall
the Black Horse Inn Dalton on Tuesday afternoon before Mr Ingham deputy
coroner on the body of John Dransfield Alias Hirst aged Twenty-Seven Years.
The following gentlemen were sworn in the jury: - John Beaumont Forman,
Hirst, Tolson, Kaye, Gelder, Bailey, Byram, Atkinson, Brook, Jenson and
Battye, Mr Sykes solicitor of Huddersfield watch the case on behalf of
friends of the family.
John Gummersall landlord of the Black Horse Dalton said I know the deceased;
his name was John Dransfield alias Hirst of Nab Hill Dalton. He was a Fancy
weaver by trade. He came into my house on Monday night 25th March
1861 at about 12 o’clock, I did not see him come in, we were very busy it
being club night.
When I first saw him, he appeared very quiet and peaceable. The accused Paul
Kaye was there also John Pollard, and several others about twenty altogether
none of the party were drunk.
Just previous to me closing my house at about 1 O’clock, the deceased and
Kaye had some words, as to who should pay for a pint of ale, deceased and
Kaye as to who should pay for a pint of ale, the deceased said Kaye owed him
2p, which Kaye denied and they began to called each other liars.
Deceased said to Kaye “I don’t care for you anyway” and Kaye replied the
same words. Deceased said I’ll make you care “I’ll fight you.” At the same
time, he thru off his coat and Kaye said he was no fighter and did not mean
fighting. I then interfered and, Kaye wanted to go home, so I moved aside to
allow him to pass.
He went passed and the deceased followed, I gave Thomas Mitchell the
deceased coat to take to him. I closed the door and began securing the house
as it was then cleared of company.
After a few minuets had elapsed and the deceased was in the habit of making
a disturbance when he left the house excited, I went to the door and opened
it partially because I was surprised at him being quiet. I herd voices at
the end of the house and walked down a little way, when I saw Mitchell,
Henry Kaye, John Hirst, Thomas Kaye and John Pollard Standing against the
garden wall, and asked were the deceased and Kaye had gone to.
From what I was told, I looked and saw something white laid against the same
wall, just five or six yard farther on, I made inquires and they said Kaye
and the deceased were fighting. Asked if they were throttling each other, as
is a common occurrence in the district and they said “No” and in a jocular
way, that they were praying, I could not see who was uppermost.
They were both stripped, directly there was a violent struggle and they both
regained their feet and started kicking and hitting each other. I believe
they had shoes on. The blows took effect on their heads, the kicks I should
think on the legs. I was eight or ten yard off, Kaye struck the deceased on
the head, which coursed him to reet a little. He gained his feet and
continued to fight. Deceased said he would give up or yield the fight and
they did so and were quite, after I came from the house they were not
fighting for more than a minute.
I told Kaye I was surprised at him and that I should have to report it to
the police, as he is reckoned so quite, he replied that it was the fist time
he had fought in his life and should not have done it but he was bound to do
it. There was no seconded kicking. Pollard said they would take the deceased
with them, and called him to go away, but the deceased moaned and begged to
be left, moaning to hurt.Pollard called Mitchell and they took the deceased
eventually away, Kaye walked before them and I returned to the house. I did
not see the deceased coat after I gave it to Mitchell.
I saw Kaye take his coat of the wall and put it on. I did not see the
deceased again, I am told he died Saturday night about ten o’clock. For
anything I never saw, Kaye is a quit lad particular so for the
neighbourhood.
By the jury: it was a moonlight night, I never saw any fight between them
before. I did not hear the deceased speak; Kaye was perfectly sober and did
not seek a quarrel.
By the Coroner: Kaye could have got away from the deceased if he liked.
By the jury: deceased was notorious as a fighter in when in liquor, when in
liquor I have seen him common fighting and had to turn him out of the house.
By Mr Sykes: deceased leaned is head against the wall when he gave up the
fight.
Thomas Mitchell Fancy Weaver of Dalton Bank said I knew the deceased, and
was with him at this house Monday night week; I was there before he came in
about half past Ten O’clock after our lodge had closed.
Kaye and he came in together I believe from Huddersfield, they were not
sober yet not drunk. They were drinking ale together but I do not know the
quantity, we had sat for an hour or two in cheerful company, and Kaye and
the deceased began fratching about a few coppers and called each other
liars.
The deceased took off his coat and challenged Kaye to fight. Kaye said he
did not want to fight, and the deceased continued to pushing him about
trying to get him to fight, and called a liar. Kaye still declined to fight
and they both went out of the house. Kaye called the deceased the same.
At last, Kaye said he would fight him and strip off his coat. Thy started to
fight at the end of the house and struck each other. They came close and
fell to the ground. The deceased was underneath; they did not fall very
heavily. They lay about minutes before they moved.
Kaye first moved and struck him on the left side with his feet. The landlord
(the last witness) came out off the house while they were down, and they
jumped up and started fighting again striking and kicking each other several
times.
The blows from the fists were about the head and the kicks about the legs. I
noticed in particular that Kaye kicked the deceased at the bottom of the
belly. I did not think it was a kick sufficient to make a large wound but it
seemed to hurt him.
After this kick several blows were struck by both and the deceased gave in.
He leaned his head on the shutters, and then crossed over, when he cried out
“Oh my belly” I hold him up as he could hardly stand, and Pollard put his
coat on. I left Pollard with him, but Pollard called me back and I walked
him home.
When I was coming away, he went into the field and lay down. He did not stay
there in a minuet we lifted on our shoulders and carried him to his gate.
I visited him several times and was with all one night but I did not hear
him say a word that he should die. On Thursday, he be very weak, and saw him
on Saturday afternoon he was sensible but rambled a little at times.
Mr George Gardner Doctor of medicine, Moldgreen said I was called about one
o’clock on Tuesday the 26th last to attend the deceased, I found
him complaining very much with pain in his belly, and attended him till his
death.
My opinion was that his belly had ruptured and treat him accordingly. He
died on Saturday from inflammation of the lining membrane of the belly,
caused by urine. I have since made a post mortem examination assisted by Mr
Tatterson of Lepton and found rupture of the bladder, which no doubt was the
cause of death. From the evidence I have heard, the kick described by
Mitchell was very likely the cause.
By the foreman, these injuries must have been caused by a direct blow.
John Pollard of Nab Hill was then called at the request of Mr Jebson Juryman; he fully corroborated the evidence of Mr Mitchell. He noticed the deceased received a particular kick on the lower part of the belly from Kaye. He cried out his belly was hurt and said Kaye had poised him on the belly. Paul Kaye was then called forwards by the coroner and after being duly warned declined to say anything. The jury returned a verdict of manslaughter against Paul Kaye, and he was fully committed for trail on the coroners warrant at the next assizes. The enquirer lasted three hours, bail was allowed.